Skip to main content
Steelers · deep dive · week 4, 2026

Pittsburgh 27‑24 loss: the offence stalled

Week 4, at Cleveland. Explosive-play rate ranked 1st of 2 this week; EPA per play ranked 2nd. Here's what the data says happened.

8 Oct 2026 · 5 min read
+0.07epa per play

The Steelers lost to Cleveland 27-24 in week 4. As a fan I'd like to tell you it was all one thing. The numbers say it wasn't, so here's the game broken down the same way we'd break down anyone else's: protection, who got open, the calls, the drives, and the defence.

+0.07Offence EPA/play2nd of 2 this week
47%Success rateleague 48%
+0.10Defence EPA/play allowed2nd of 2
38%Third downs13 attempts, avg 7.4 to go
0%25%50%75%100%Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1 03:03: PIT score (6-0)Q1 02:59: PIT score (7-0)Q2 12:22: CLE score (7-6)Q2 12:14: CLE score (7-7)Q2 08:33: CLE score (7-13)Q2 08:28: CLE score (7-14)Q2 01:25: CLE score (7-20)Q2 01:22: CLE score (7-21)Q2 00:12: PIT score (10-21)Q4 10:16: PIT score (16-21)Q4 06:42: CLE score (16-24)Q4 01:46: PIT score (22-24)Q4 01:42: PIT score (24-24)Q4 00:15: CLE score (24-27)12345CLE winning ↑PIT winning ↓
■ Browns ahead■ Steelers ahead① biggest swings● scoring plays
The Browns' chance of winning, play by play. Every swing play and drive on the game page.

Protection

PFR's pressure charting for week 4 hasn't landed yet, so this section leans on play-by-play: 10 of 46 dropbacks ended in a hit or a sack.

A.Rodgers: EPA per dropback, clean vs hit or sacked (week 4)

Clean, PIT (36)+0.285Clean, league+0.374Hit or sacked, PIT (10)-0.782Hit or sacked, league-0.786

Who got open, and where the ball went

PlayerTgtSep (yd)Catch %Yds
DK Metcalf91.656%115
Roman Wilson62.150%74
Pat Freiermuth52.060%17
Darnell Washington52.660%27

Targets vs separation (Next Gen Stats, week 4; league average separation 2.9 yd)

The calls and the drives

In neutral situations (early downs, within a score, first three quarters) Pittsburgh threw on 54% of plays (league 57%). Passes were worth +0.05 EPA and runs +0.11. 46% of third downs were 7+ yards to go (league 48%) — so early downs mostly kept them on schedule; the problem was converting.

12 drives, 4 trips inside the 20, 75% of them finished with a touchdown (league 88%). Drive endings: 5 punts, 3 touchdowns, 2 turnovers, 1 missed field goal.

The defence

Cleveland managed +0.10 EPA per play against us (2nd of 2 defences this week), converted 40% of third downs, and we got 2 sacks and 2 takeaways. Season to date the offence ranks 25th and the defence 16th of 32 by EPA per play.

Who won the matchups

DK Metcalf against Cleveland: Metcalf won it. 115 yards on 9 targets, against his usual 51.

T.J. Watt against Cleveland: Watt won it. 1 sack and 1 other QB hit, against his usual 1.5 sacks and hits a game.

Harold Fannin Jr. against Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh won it. Fannin held to 27 yards on 5 targets, against his usual 44.

What to fix vs Indianapolis

EPA per play: +0.07 this week, 2nd of 2 (league +0.08). Indianapolis rank 31st of 32 in EPA per play allowed so far (+0.17, league +0.01). Stay on schedule: early-down efficiency is what keeps third downs manageable. Third-down conversion: 38% this week, 2nd of 2 (league 39%). Indianapolis rank 10th of 32 in third-down conversion allowed so far (38%, league 42%). The distances were manageable, so this is execution on the money down — the calls and the throws on third, not the early downs.

Data still landing

Not available when this was drafted: PFR pressure charting for week 4; FTN charting (reads, play action) for week 4. Those sections use play-by-play instead.

Sources: nflverse play-by-play; PFR advanced passing; Next Gen Stats; FTN charting. Every number here comes straight from our pipeline.