SEA
DEN
HOU
JAX
BAL
PHI
CHI
NYG
NYJ
TEN
IND
LV
LAC
KC
WAS
2Emeka Egbuka
Tampa Bay Buccaneers#21 yrs expOhio State73 · 205 lbBest at volume, weak efficiency
Each axis is a percentile against every qualified wide receiver over the same window. The dashed white shape is the position average; the gold ring marks elite (90th percentile).
63: situation-dependent
One number for how well Egbuka has actually played lately, not a talent rating. 70% is the skill profile, weighted towards efficiency; the rest is how steady his games are and whether he still produces against the better defences. Ranked against every qualified wide receiver; 99 is the best. Over the last three seasons he scores 60 (#80 of 121).
Trend and schedule are shown for context but kept out of the number: over a handful of games they're mostly noise.
Where Egbuka can hurt the Steelers
How he gets his production, set against how the Steelers have held up in their last 17 games. Ranks are of 32.
Where his targets come from
Share of his targets. The white tick is the league average.
How PIT defend it
Ranked of 32, last 17 games. Green is a weakness to attack.
- Pittsburgh rank 27th against intermediate throws, which make up 39% of Egbuka's targets.
- Contested catches aren't his edge this week: he's 38th percentile for separation and 16th for hands, and Joey Porter Jr. and Brandin Echols both allow fewer yards per target than the average corner (7.4).
- Free data doesn't show who covers whom on each snap, so this is the defence's profile, not a confirmed one-on-one.
PIT's corners, last 17 games
Who is likely to see him. Free data doesn't say who covers whom on each snap, so this is the group, not a confirmed matchup.
| Corner | Targets | Yds / target | Catch % | Depth faced | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Ramsey | 77 | 7.7 | 71% | 6.4 | 111 |
| Joey Porter Jr. | 62 | 5.1 | 48% | 8.9 | 59 |
| Brandin Echols | 61 | 7.0 | 69% | 6.3 | 91 |
| Asante Samuel Jr. | 33 | 13.5 | 61% | 13.2 | 112 |
The average corner allows 7.4 yards per target. Red is tighter than average, green is looser.
How his games are spread
Game by game
Every game
| Game | Opponent | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Air yds | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 wk 5 |  DAL | 9 | 6 | 38 | 0 | 71 | +0.5 |
| 26 wk 4 |  GB | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 18 | -4.3 |
| 26 wk 3 |  MIN | 9 | 5 | 62 | 0 | 91 | -0.5 |
| 26 wk 2 |  CLE | 5 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 75 | -1.7 |
| 26 wk 1 |  CIN | 6 | 5 | 63 | 0 | 84 | +4.8 |
| 25 wk 18 |  CAR | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 28 | -4.8 |
| 25 wk 17 |  MIA | 5 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 61 | -4.7 |
| 25 wk 16 | CAR | 2 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 40 | +3.0 |
| 25 wk 15 |  ATL | 7 | 4 | 64 | 0 | 111 | +3.5 |
| 25 wk 14 |  NO | 9 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 132 | -2.8 |
| 25 wk 13 |  ARI | 8 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 84 | -2.0 |
| 25 wk 12 |  LA | 8 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 87 | -1.9 |
| 25 wk 11 |  BUF | 9 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 42 | -4.4 |
| 25 wk 10 |  NE | 13 | 6 | 115 | 1 | 144 | +2.5 |
| 25 wk 8 | NO | 9 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 99 | -2.3 |
| 25 wk 7 |  DET | 12 | 4 | 58 | 0 | 175 | -8.3 |
| 25 wk 6 |  SF | 4 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 46 | -0.3 |