
Drake London
Elite volume, less so depth
Each axis is a percentile against every qualified wide receiver over the same window. The dashed white shape is the position average; the gold ring marks elite (90th percentile).
98: elite creator
One number for how well London has actually played lately, not a talent rating. 70% is the skill profile, weighted towards efficiency; the rest is how steady his games are and whether he still produces against the better defences. Ranked against every qualified wide receiver; 99 is the best. Over the last three seasons he scores 70 (#60 of 121).
Trend and schedule are shown for context but kept out of the number: over a handful of games they're mostly noise.
This week's lines against his last 17
Each bar is a game; green cleared the line. "Market says" is the bookmaker's price with the margin taken out. Our own prop model is switched off until it passes a public audit, so this is history and the market, not a tip.
Receiving yards over 71.5
Receptions over 5.5
Where London can hurt the Chiefs
How he gets his production, set against how the Chiefs have held up in their last 17 games. Ranks are of 32.
Where his targets come from
Share of his targets. The white tick is the league average.
How KC defend it
Ranked of 32, last 17 games. Green is a weakness to attack.
- Kansas City rank 25th against deep balls, and 14% of London's targets travel 20+ yards (the average WR is at 17%).
- Free data doesn't show who covers whom on each snap, so this is the defence's profile, not a confirmed one-on-one.
KC's corners, last 17 games
Who is likely to see him. Free data doesn't say who covers whom on each snap, so this is the group, not a confirmed matchup.
| Corner | Targets | Yds / target | Catch % | Depth faced | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nohl Williams | 59 | 6.6 | 47% | 9.5 | 70 |
| L'Jarius Sneed | 43 | 7.9 | 79% | 6.4 | 105 |
| Jaylen Watson | 31 | 6.9 | 58% | 11.7 | 85 |
| Kristian Fulton | 28 | 6.1 | 57% | 9.0 | 66 |
The average corner allows 7.4 yards per target. Red is tighter than average, green is looser.
How his games are spread
Game by game
Every game
| Game | Opponent | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Air yds | EPA | Over 71.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 wk 9 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 0 | 38 | +6.9 | No | |
| 26 wk 8 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 63 | -10.5 | No | |
| 26 wk 7 | 10 | 7 | 66 | 1 | 86 | +7.0 | No | |
| 26 wk 6 | 10 | 4 | 62 | 0 | 143 | -2.3 | No | |
| 26 wk 5 | 11 | 7 | 118 | 0 | 119 | +7.5 | Yes | |
| 26 wk 4 | 6 | 5 | 96 | 0 | 66 | +6.9 | Yes | |
| 26 wk 3 | 10 | 9 | 194 | 0 | 97 | +12.3 | Yes | |
| 26 wk 2 | 5 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 23 | +3.3 | No | |
| 26 wk 1 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 22 | +0.7 | No | |
| 25 wk 18 | 8 | 4 | 78 | 1 | 112 | +4.5 | Yes | |
| 25 wk 17 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 29 | -0.6 | No | |
| 25 wk 16 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 109 | -1.7 | No | |
| 25 wk 11 | 9 | 7 | 119 | 0 | 96 | +8.8 | Yes | |
| 25 wk 10 | 8 | 6 | 104 | 1 | 95 | +7.8 | Yes | |
| 25 wk 9 | 14 | 9 | 118 | 3 | 143 | +11.4 | Yes | |
| 25 wk 7 | 10 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 110 | -8.4 | No | |
| 25 wk 6 | 16 | 10 | 158 | 1 | 172 | +4.5 | Yes |